Clinical Coordinator Criteria
Prepared by: [Your Name]
Date: [Date]
Introduction
The purpose of this document is to outline the criteria used for evaluating candidates for the Registered Nurse position. This evaluation framework ensures a comprehensive assessment of candidates based on their qualifications, skills, and experience relevant to the role. The criteria are designed to support fair and objective decision-making in the hiring process.
Purpose
The primary purpose of this evaluation criteria is to:
Ensure candidates meet the essential qualifications and competencies required for the Registered Nurse position.
Provide a structured and transparent method for assessing candidate suitability.
Facilitate consistent and objective evaluations across all candidates.
Support informed decision-making by highlighting key areas of expertise and experience.
Scope
These evaluation criteria apply to all candidates applying for the Registered Nurse position. They cover the assessment of qualifications, experience, certifications, skills, and other relevant attributes necessary for the role. The criteria are designed to be applied uniformly across all applicants to ensure a fair and unbiased selection process.
Criteria Table:
Criteria | Description | Measurement Method | Weight (%) | Importance Level |
|---|
Education | Bachelor’s degree in Nursing or related field. | Verification of academic credentials and degree certificates. | 10% | High |
Experience | 3-5 years of clinical experience. | Review of employment history and reference checks. | 20% | Very High |
Certifications | Valid nursing license, BLS, and ACLS. | Verification of valid and up-to-date certifications. | 15% | High |
Team Leadership | Ability to lead and manage clinical teams. | Performance evaluations and feedback from team members and supervisors. | 15% | High |
Communication Skills | Excellent verbal and written communication. | Assessment through interviews and written tests. | 10% | Medium |
Technical Proficiency | Proficiency in EHR systems and medical software. | Practical tests and demonstrations of software proficiency. | 10% | Medium |
Patient Care | Focus on high-quality patient care and safety. | Review of patient care records and patient feedback surveys. | 15% | Very High |
Problem-Solving | Ability to resolve clinical and operational issues. | Situational judgment tests and review of past performance. | 5% | Medium |
Compliance & Education | Understanding of regulations and commitment to professional development. | Knowledge quizzes, compliance records, and education documentation. | 10% | Medium |
Explanation:
Very High: Criteria that are crucial to the core responsibilities of the role and significantly impact job performance.
High: Important criteria that strongly influence the candidate's effectiveness and capability in the role.
Medium: Important but not as critical as the "High" criteria; these skills enhance overall performance but are not as central to the role’s core responsibilities.
Weight and Importance Levels
Each criterion is weighted according to its importance to the role:
Very High: 35% (Experience and Patient Care)
High: 30% (Certifications, Team Leadership)
Medium: 35% (Communication Skills, Technical Proficiency, Problem-Solving, Compliance, Continuing Education)
Evaluation Process
Initial Screening:
Education: Confirm possession of a Bachelor’s degree in Nursing or a related field.
Certifications: Verify current nursing license and certifications (BLS, ACLS).
Experience Assessment:
Skills and Competencies Evaluation:
Team Leadership: Evaluate leadership abilities through performance reviews and feedback.
Communication Skills: Test communication skills via interviews and written assessments.
Technical Proficiency: Check proficiency in EHR systems and medical software with practical tests.
Patient Care and Problem-Solving:
Compliance and Continuing Education:
Criteria Templates @ Template.net
