Legal Case Evidence Catalog Rubric
This rubric is designed to assist in the organization and evaluation of evidence for legal cases handled by [Your Company Name]. It encompasses various types of evidence commonly encountered in legal proceedings. The table below provides both the categories and their respective descriptions of what constitutes each rating level.
Category | Excellent (4) | Good (3) | Fair (2) | Poor (1) |
|---|
Document Evidence | Documents are highly relevant, authentic, and well-supported. | Documents are mostly relevant and authentic but may have minor issues. | Some relevance or authenticity issues with documents. | Documents are largely irrelevant, unreliable, or inadmissible. |
Witness Testimony | Witnesses are credible, consistent, and provide crucial information. | Witnesses are generally credible and provide valuable information, with minor inconsistencies. | Witnesses may have credibility issues or significant inconsistencies. | Witnesses lack credibility, consistency, or provide irrelevant information. |
Physical Evidence | Physical evidence is well-preserved, relevant, and properly documented. | Physical evidence is mostly relevant and documented but may have minor preservation issues. | Some relevance or documentation issues with physical evidence. | Physical evidence is poorly preserved, irrelevant, or inadequately documented. |
Expert Opinions | Expert opinions are highly credible, well-supported, and relevant. | Expert opinions are generally credible and relevant, with minor gaps or issues. | Some credibility or relevance issues with expert opinions. | Expert opinions lack credibility, relevance, or are unreliable. |
Legal Templates @ Template.net
