Science Fair Project Rubric
Criteria | Poor (1-2) | Below Average (3-4) | Average (5-6) | Good (7-8) | Outstanding (9-10) |
|---|
Presentation of Research | Little to no research was presented. | Some research presented significant gaps. | The research was presented adequately but could be more comprehensive. | Well well-researched with minor missing information. | Exceptionally well-researched and comprehensive. |
Understanding of Topic (Solar Energy) | Does not show an understanding of solar energy. | Shows minimal understanding of solar energy. | Shows adequate understanding of solar energy. | Shows a good understanding of solar energy with minor confusion. | Shows outstanding understanding of solar energy. |
Experiment Design | The experiment lacks creativity and is not well designed. | The experiment shows minor creativity and design. | The experiment is average in creativity and design. | The experiment is good in creativity and design with minor flaws. | The experiment is outstanding in creativity and well-designed. |
Result Analysis | Results were not analyzed or inaccurately analyzed. | Results were poorly analyzed. | Results were analyzed adequately with possible room for improvement. | Results were well analyzed with minor misunderstandings. | Results were outstandingly and accurately analyzed. |
Conclusion | No relevant conclusion was given. | Poor conclusions may not align with the results. | Average conclusion that aligns with results. | Good conclusion that well aligns with and interprets results. | Outstanding conclusion that excellently aligns with and interprets results. |
Rubric Templates @ Template.net
