Professional Evaluation Rubric
Evaluation Criteria
1. Job Knowledge and Skills
This section evaluates the employee's understanding of their role, relevant skills, and industry knowledge.
Rating Level | Description |
|---|
5 | Expert knowledge and mastery of all relevant skills. |
4 | Proficient knowledge with occasional need for guidance. |
3 | Basic understanding; requires regular supervision. |
2 | Limited knowledge; struggles with job responsibilities. |
1 | No understanding; fails to meet role requirements. |
2. Quality of Work
This section assesses the accuracy, thoroughness, and overall quality of the employee's output.
Rating Level | Description |
|---|
5 | Consistently produces exceptional work; exceeds expectations. |
4 | Generally produces high-quality work with minor errors. |
3 | Meets basic quality standards; occasional inaccuracies. |
2 | Often produces low-quality work; many errors present. |
1 | Work is unacceptable; fails to meet basic standards. |
3. Communication Skills
This section evaluates both verbal and written communication skills, as well as the ability to collaborate with others.
Rating Level | Description |
|---|
5 | Excellent communicator; conveys ideas clearly and effectively. |
4 | Generally effective communicator; minor misunderstandings occur. |
3 | Adequate communication; occasionally unclear. |
2 | Poor communicator; often causes confusion among team members. |
1 | Fails to communicate effectively; significant misunderstandings. |
4. Teamwork and Collaboration
This section assesses the employee's ability to work with others and contribute to team objectives.
Rating Level | Description |
|---|
5 | Exceptional team player; inspires and motivates colleagues. |
4 | Collaborates well; contributes positively to team dynamics. |
3 | Participates adequately but does not take initiative. |
2 | Struggles to collaborate; often disrupts team efforts. |
1 | Does not work well with others; isolates from team activities. |
Overall Performance Summary
This section provides a qualitative assessment based on the ratings given in each criterion. The evaluator should summarize the employee’s strengths, areas for improvement, and overall performance.
Strengths:
Areas for Improvement:
Overall Performance Rating:
Evaluation Process
The evaluation will be conducted annually by the direct supervisor, Jewell Ward, and the HR department. Employees are encouraged to participate in a self-assessment prior to the evaluation meeting.
For any inquiries regarding this evaluation rubric, please contact [Your Name] at [Your Email] or reach out to [Your Company Name] at [Your Company Email].
