Interview Evaluation

[YOUR COMPANY NAME]

Applicant's Information:

Name:

Position:

Date of Interview:

Interviewer(s):

Candidate Qualifications:

Education:

Relevant Experience:

Certification/Licences:

Date: [DATE]

Introduction

This Interview Evaluation Form has been meticulously crafted to assess candidates' qualifications, skills, and cultural fit for the position. It aims to provide comprehensive insights into each candidate's strengths, weaknesses, and overall suitability, facilitating data-driven hiring decisions. By ensuring fairness, transparency, and a positive candidate experience, this evaluation process contributes to organizational success and growth.

Background

Effective hiring decisions rely on a thorough evaluation of candidates' capabilities and alignment with organizational values. This evaluation form is designed to gather structured feedback from interviewers, enabling a holistic assessment of candidates' performance across various criteria. By utilizing this form, we aim to streamline the hiring process, identify top talent, and foster a work environment conducive to success.

Evaluation Criteria

Rating Scale: 1 = Poor, 2 = Fair, 3 = Good, 4 = Very Good, 5 = Excellent

Criteria	Rating (1-5)	Comments
Technical Skills
Communication Skills
Problem-solving Abilities
Team Collaboration
Adaptability
Cultural Fit
Leadership Potential
Overall Suitability

Evaluation Summary

Strengths:

The candidate demonstrated exceptional problem-solving skills during the technical assessment, effectively addressing complex scenarios.
Communication skills were outstanding, with clear articulation and active listening evident throughout the interview.
Showed strong adaptability, readily adjusting to unexpected challenges presented during the role-play exercises.

Weaknesses:

Limited experience in team collaboration was observed, with some instances of difficulty in effectively integrating ideas within group discussions.
The cultural fit could be further evaluated, as alignment with organizational values and norms was not demonstrated during the interview.
Leadership potential was not explicitly showcased, indicating potential areas for growth and development in this aspect.

Recommendation

Hire
Consider for Further Evaluation
Do Not Hire

Additional Comments and Notes:

Additional Comments and Notes

Note: Ratings are based on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 indicating low proficiency and 5 indicating high proficiency. Please provide specific examples or observations to support your ratings and comments. Thank you for your valuable input in the hiring process.